Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18367, first published .
Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Journals

  1. Birlo M, Edwards P, Clarkson M, Stoyanov D. Utility of optical see-through head mounted displays in augmented reality-assisted surgery: A systematic review. Medical Image Analysis 2022;77:102361 View
  2. Zari G, Condino S, Cutolo F, Ferrari V. Magic Leap 1 versus Microsoft HoloLens 2 for the Visualization of 3D Content Obtained from Radiological Images. Sensors 2023;23(6):3040 View
  3. Zucker E. Cardiac Computed Tomography in Congenital Heart Disease. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2024;62(3):435 View
  4. Lee S, Panchal N, Hoffman W, Pomerantz J, Laguna B, Courtier J. An Augmented Reality Model for Evaluating Traumatic Craniofacial Fractures. FACE 2024;5(3):525 View
  5. Demeco A, Renzi F, Frizziero A, Palermi S, Salerno A, Foresti R, Martini C, Costantino C. Imaging Derived Holograms Improve Surgical Outcome in Inexperienced Surgeons: A Meta-Analysis. Surgical Innovation 2025;32(3):270 View
  6. Hobbs J, Bull C, Claisse C, Elameer M, Davison R. Investigating the Role of Augmented Reality in Tertiary Care Using Thematic Analysis (Preprint). JMIR XR and Spatial Computing 2024 View