This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile tools for surgery and perioperative medicine (85) Imaging Informatics (200) Augmented Reality (incl. Google Glass) Applications (93)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18367, first published .
Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Comparing Computed Tomography–Derived Augmented Reality Holograms to a Standard Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Viewer for Presurgical Planning: Feasibility Study

Authors of this article:

David Dallas-Orr1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yordan Penev1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Schultz1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jesse Courtier3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Birlo M, Edwards P, Clarkson M, Stoyanov D. Utility of optical see-through head mounted displays in augmented reality-assisted surgery: A systematic review. Medical Image Analysis 2022;77:102361 View
  2. Zari G, Condino S, Cutolo F, Ferrari V. Magic Leap 1 versus Microsoft HoloLens 2 for the Visualization of 3D Content Obtained from Radiological Images. Sensors 2023;23(6):3040 View
  3. Zucker E. Cardiac Computed Tomography in Congenital Heart Disease. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2024;62(3):435 View
  4. Lee S, Panchal N, Hoffman W, Pomerantz J, Laguna B, Courtier J. An Augmented Reality Model for Evaluating Traumatic Craniofacial Fractures. FACE 2024;5(3):525 View